New York Office
16 Court Street, 28th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11241
Phone: (718) COURT • ST or
(718) 643-6063
Richard Klass, Esq. attorney at law, "Your Court Street Lawyer," litigation, real estate, property, Brooklyn, New York
Richard A. Klass, Esq.
Richard A. Klass


Attorneys and Staff


Our Newsletter: LawCURRENTST


Blog: Legal Malpractice

Articles by R. A. Klass

Videos by R. A. Klass

Presentations and Courses

On-line Public Resources


Plaintiffs Should Be Permitted to Amend the Complaint Pursuant to CPLR 3025

Creative Commons License
License information

By Richard Klass, Esq.
"Your Court Street Lawyer"


Civil Practice Law and Rules [CPLR] Section 3025 authorizes the amendment of a pleading in an action, including the Complaint of the plaintiff. According to subsection (b) of CPLR 3025, leave of court is needed to amend a pleading once issue has joined; however, it should be freely given to a party.

New York courts have held that, in the absence of prejudice to the defendant, the amendment of a pleading should be freely granted by a court. See, Kushner v. Queens Transit, 97 AD2d 432 (2d Dept. 1983); Sotomayor v. Princeton Ski Outlet Corp., 199 AD2d 197 (1st Dept. 1993). It is also well established law that a motion to amend a pleading should be freely given absent a showing by an opposing party of surprise or prejudice. Zacher v. Oakdale Islandia Ltd. Partnership, 211 AD2d 712 (2d Dept. 1995); Santori v. Met Life, 11 AD3d 597 (2d Dept. 2004).

In a recent case litigated by Richard A. Klass, Your Court Street Lawyer, it was urged that, since the action had not been pending for a significant period of time, and was not on the eve of trial, no prejudice could be shown by defendants to the amendment of the Complaint. See, e.g., Kopel v. Chiulli, 175 AD2d 102 (2d Dept. 1991). Case law has held that delay in seeking to amend the Complaint does not bar such relief. Haven Associates v. Douro Realty Corp., 96 AD2d 526 (2d Dept. 1983).

Finally, Plaintiff provided the trial court with a copy of the proposed Amended Complaint to be served upon the defendants. See, Anderson Properties Inc. v. Sawhill Tubular Division Cyclops Corp., 149 AD2d 949 (4th Dept. 1989).

— Richard A. Klass, Esq.
Copyr. 2010

License Information

Creative Commons License
Plaintiffs Should Be Permitted to Amend the Complaint Pursuant to CPLR 3025 by Richard A. Klass, Esq. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. For permissions beyond the scope of this license, please contact Mr. Klass (email: Insert the words "reprint permission request" in the subject line of the email.


Publishing Guidelines

Permission is granted to publish this article electronically in free-only publications, like a website or ezine (print and non-free publications require permission) as long as the resource box is included without any modifications. All links must be active. A courtesy copy is requested on publication (email:

Article Title:
Plaintiffs Should Be Permitted to Amend the Complaint Pursuant to CPLR 3025

Article URL:

Author Name:
Richard A. Klass, Esq.

Contact Email Address:

Author's Firm's Website:

Word Count:
278 words

[This resource box must be included in any publications.]

* * *

Resource Box

About the Author:
Richard A. Klass, Esq. maintains a law firm engaged in civil litigation at 16 Court Street, 28th Floor, Brooklyn Heights, New York. He may be reached by phone at (718) COURT-ST [(718) 268-7878)] or with any questions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Read the original article in context at:

Additional articles by Mr. Klass may be found at:
Back issues from Mr. Klass' quarterly newsletter, Law CURRENTS are available at
Articles from Law CURRENTS may be available for reprint. Please see individual articles for license information.

* * *


Website copyr. 1999-2015 Richard A. Klass.
Website marketing: The Innovation Works, Inc.

Attorney Advertising